sequester

Sequestration, DoD, and the Federal-Deficit Sweet Spot

A U.S. national debt clock is seen at the 2012 Republican National Convention in Tampa, Fla., last August. (Harry E. Walker/MCT/via Getty Images)

For the Pentagon and U.S. defense sector, being so tethered to Washington’s broader debate about spending and the federal deficit has become something of a Catch-22.

That tethering — because politicians could not agree on how to replace a $500 billion cut to planned Defense Department spending — essentially caused the so-called sequestration cuts to be triggered March 1. Yet, there is no sense — for now, at least — on Capitol Hill that anything shy of a “grand bargain” fiscal deal that brings some finality to the deficit/spending debate will be offered to turn them off. More

Will Obama’s Charm Offensive Produce ‘Big Deal’ Needed to Turn Off Sequester Cuts?

President Obama makes a call in the Oval Office. Since last weekend, Obama has been making calls to some Republican senators. One topic: a potential Big Deal that could undo big defense budget cuts. (White House photo via flickr)

What’s this odd thing breaking out in Washington? No, not the snow storm the experts say is coming (any minute now…), but Republicans and Democrats mingling, talking about policy and legislation? The president is phoning and planning to wine and dine some GOP lawmakers? Republican and Democratic senators walking together through a throng of reporters, audibly discussing policy?

It can mean only one thing: Pursuit of the “Big Deal” is back. And, for defense wonks, it just might be one of the few paths toward turning off the sequester mechanism — and its Pentagon spending cuts. More

Fact-Checking House Speaker John Boehner (Video)

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

“There’s no plan from Senate Democrats or the White House to replace the sequester. And over the last 10 months, House Republicans have acted twice to replace the sequester.” — House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, during a Sunday appearance on “Meet The Press.”

There were votes on Capitol Hill last week, followed by a high-level Friday White House meeting down Pennsylvania Avenue. But there was no serious effort to again delay or permanently replace the sequestration cuts. And there were plenty of iffy statements like the one uttered by the speaker. More

As Sequestration Deadline Nears, Another General Gives a Dire Warning

Defense Intelligence Agency Director Army Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn at the 2012 GEOINT conference in Orlando, Fla. (NGA Photo)

The Friday deadline for triggering cuts to planned Pentagon spending is getting closer. And the predictions from America’s top generals about what might happen if the sequestration cuts go into effect March 27 keep getting more dire.

The chairman and Joint Chiefs and Staff and the chiefs of the four armed services spent hours the last few weeks telling mostly sympathetic lawmakers how they would cancel most training, furlough nearly 100,000 civilian employees, put off or cancel most maintenance on things like naval ships and Air Force planes, and shed more troops than under previously planned post-war end strength adjustment plans.

So bleak were the warnings that this week even some Republican lawmakers expressed doubt about whether the generals are indeed being straight about the true effects of sequestration. But, make no mistake, the generals aren’t changing their gloom-and-doom public relations strategy. More

Essay: Did Everyone Misread the Sequestration Narrative?

House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va., delivers remarks during a news conference with fellow House GOP leaders at the Republican Party Headquarters on Feb. 13 in Washington. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

This is it. The clock is again ticking down toward Washington’s latest, as so many are calling it, “self-inflicted crisis,” also known as sequestration.

But what if it is nothing of the sort? What if the conventional wisdom about sequestration created a flawed narrative? More

Rep. Hoyer Casts Doubt Over Loophole Closures As a Solution to Sequestration

House Minority Whip Rep. Steny Hoyer, D-Md., speaks during a recent news conference on Capitol Hill. Hoyer says he has met privately with GOP members about avoiding the pending sequester cuts. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)

Like Pentagon officials, defense industry executives and employees within their organizations, your correspondent is looking for any small clue that might show a path leading toward a deal that would void or again delay pending national defense cuts. Yet, when one player cracks open a door, another quickly slams it shut. More

GOP Slogan Machine Cranks Out the #Obamaquester

Speaker of the House John Boehner, center, answers reporters' questions Feb. 13 during a news conference with Rep. Martha Roby, R-Ala., left, and Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers, R-Wash., at Republican Party Headquarters in Washington. (Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images)

When it comes to political marketing and sloganeering, congressional Republicans deserve a lot of credit.

Congressional aides — even Democratic ones — and longtime Washington defense hands and analysts often remark how impressive it is how the GOP comes up with their catchy themes.

Last week featured two, one from each chamber. One worked. Will the other? More

Panetta on Sequestration: ‘We Can’t Just Sit Here and Bitch’

Outgoing U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta speaks during his final press conference in the Pentagon briefing room on Thursday. (MANDEL NGAN/AFP/Getty Images)

Leon Panetta is not the first person to curse about the pending sequestration cuts, nor the last.

And he’s not the first, nor the last, to slam lawmakers over the finger-pointing and name-calling about the $500 billion defense cuts set to kick in March 1.

But he’s the U.S. defense secretary — for a few more days, at least. So when he does such things, people take notice.

Asked at what likely was his final Pentagon press briefing about his accomplishments and disappointments, Panetta was candid when he brought up the uneasy Defense Department budget picture. He listed as one of his disappointments the fact that the Pentagon-White House-Congress “bond is not as strong as it should be.”

And then Panetta let loose:

“What I look for are members who are willing to work with us, to try to work our way through some tough issues and be able to find some solutions. We need to find solutions. We can’t just sit here and bitch; we can’t just sit here and complain; we can’t just sit here and blame others; we can’t just sit here and point fingers at each other; we can’t just sit here and try to get sound bites; we can’t just sit here and try to make points, political points.

“We have got to solve real problems facing this country. This country is facing some real threats in the world. I mean, this is not a time when we can kind of, you know, take a deep breath and assume that the rest of the world is going to be fine. We’re facing some real threats, as I’ve pointed out before. We can’t do this alone. We have to do this with a full partnership of the Congress and both houses of the Congress.”

 

 

Sen. Rand Paul: Let Defense Sequester Cuts Stand — Then Cut More

To say tea party Republicans, particularly in the House, are driving the congressional agenda is not accurate. But this faction of conservative, small-government Republicans have been able to significantly influence congressional leaders’ actions.

And few other factions can say that.

Defense firms, in placing their sequester bets, might consider that before dismissing what Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., said during the tea party’s response to President Obama’s State of the Union address.

“It is time Democrats admit that not every dollar spent on domestic programs is sacred,” Paul said. “And it is time Republicans realize that military spending is not immune to waste and fraud.” More

‘Sequestration-palooza’ Week Kicks Off. There Will be Live Tweeting.

Deputy Defense Secretary Ashton Carter will have a busy week of testimony on Capitol Hill about sequestration. (Defense Department photo)

One might call this week on Capitol Hill “Sequestration-palooza.” That’s because there are three hearings featuring senior Pentagon officials focused on the pending decade-long reduction in planned national defense spending. And other hearings will focus on the nation’s overall budget and economic situation, including sequestration.

First up is a Tuesday Senate Armed Services Committee hearing featuring Deputy Defense Secretary Ashton Carter, Pentagon Comptroller Robert Hale, Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey and all four service chiefs. Expect gloomy predictions of canceled weapon programs, massive layoffs, unmet combatant commander requirements, and more. Your Defense News/Intercepts correspondents will be live-blogging the deliberations. Follow Congressional Reporter John T. Bennnett, Land Warfare Reporter Paul McLeary and Air Warfare Reporter Aaron Mehta for live updates.

Back to top