
GOP nominee Mitt Romney, left, and President Barack Obama shake hands following their testy debate on Oct. 16 at Hofstra University in New York. (SAUL LOEB/AFP/Getty Images)
What did we learn during the second presidential debate about the Sept. 11 attack on a U.S. diplomatic facility in Libya that left four dead? We are all confident U.S. President Barack Obama did indeed use the word “terror” when he spoke about it the following day in the Rose Garden.
That’s all, however.
GOP nominee Mitt Romney attempted to use the attack to undermine Obama’s credibility on foreign policy. Instead, he appeared unaware Obama’s Rose Garden speech did signal the Libyan consulate attack was carried out by terrorists.
Obama instructed Romney to “get the transcript.”
I did. Here’s the line to which Obama was referring his opponent: “No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for.”
Let the debate among cable news talking head and campaign surrogates about the definition of “act of terror” begin! After all, Obama and his speechwriters opted for that phrase instead of plainly calling it on Sept. 12 a “terrorist attack.”
The political chattering class got its Big Gaffe of the Night. The cable news networks got a new narrative to repeat on what will seem a constant loop of talking points and volume ahead of the final debate, which will be devoted solely to foreign policy.
But did we get any new details from Obama about the weeks and months leading up to the consulate attack that killed the U.S. ambassador and three others? No.
In a letter sent this week to Obama by Sen. Lindsey Graham, the South Carolina Republican asked several straightforward but important questions: “Mr. President, were you informed of these attacks on our Libyan consulate? If not, why not? Did you consider these serious events? If you were informed, what action was taken to protect the consulate?”
Did we get any answers to those questions? Not one.
And did Romney offer any clues on what he would have done differently to make sure a U.S. embassy or consulate in a potentially volatile nation undergoing a messy and tense political transition is as secure as possible? No.
Obama harshly lectured Romney in perhaps the tense debate’s most dramatic moment about making claims that “anybody in my team, whether the secretary of state (Hillary Clinton), our U.N. ambassador (Susan Rice), anybody on my team would play politics or mislead when we’ve lost four of our own.” Seeming to stare Romney directly in his eyes, Obama said: “Governor, [that] is offensive. That’s not what we do. That’s not what I do as president, that’s not what I do as commander in chief.”
Romney attempted to rally, but made his infamous Rose Garden gaffe.
Don’t expect that exchange to be the final Libya moment of the campaign.
A GOP congressional source, just hours before the debate, kept steering a conversation with me back to Libya. During a television interview on Oct. 17, Republican National Committee Chief Reince Priebus said the final debate will give Romney an opportunity to press Obama on the very questions raised by Graham.



ben sweeney
The President has now said that he knew it was terrorism right away… flew to Las Vegas and from that point it was a video….
The infamous ridiculous video…. for our purposes the “Scapegoat Video” has been used to divert us from Obama’s failures in foreign policy.
It hurt his narrative… (Usama dead..GM alive etc…) but the political wing of the POTUS used the video… but at what cost… increasing the rage against Christian Coptics in the Middle East… we already are seeing the results of ” fast and furious ” (selling guns to mexico gangs)…..
now we have “Fasting and Furious”….
imagine how many Coptics have been killed do the promotional/diversionary activities of this administration.
Jennifer Pena
Nice piece!
Mark Fisher
Ok, If Obama said it was terrorists from day one, then the administration lied about it for the next 14 days. There is no way out of this one, the video was introduced to take the heat off of the administrations inept polices, period. When they finally realized the lie wasn’t working, they decided to talk out of the other side of their face and admit it was terrorism. This clearly indicates that President Obamas advisors are as inept in foreign policy as he is.
Judy
Thanks so much for your insights – very helpful!
Ky
The President only read out loud to us that “no acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation….”
He didn’t declare this attack a terrorist attack, he didn’t even say “this act of terror”..
His statement is a general statement and not an indictment of terror. Very carefully worded so as not to be an accusation of terrorism.
dave
@ KY , Vietnam was never DECLARED a war so there fore it never happened? is that your “thinking”? and your comment, Very carefully worded so as not to be an accusation of terrorism.” WTF ?? IT WAS WORDED TO BUILD UP OUR GREAT NATION, why do u choose to be so blind??? Romney was wrong! be careful of who’s Kool-aid you drink from
Clio
On 9/12 he called it AN ATTACK
On 10/16 he called it AN ACT OF TERROR
Mr. Obama uses the indefinate article (an) and defines the article (Sept. 11th bombing of Libyian consluate) in two different ways, clearly noted above. This is 5th grade english, my fellow americans. Grab a book from your public library. Its free. I googled the transcripts. They are posted….free, as is our 1st amemdment right. So is the free internet. Dan Quayle invented it, remember ;-).
tdot
@Clio. Wrong it was Al Gore that invented the internet (or so it was said of him)